Today I wanted to write about 2 subjects that really irk me. First, I wanted to talk about upgraded devices launching in the same year as the original, which I touched on in this article. Secondly, I wanted to talk about the Bigger is Better issue that the Galaxy S III Mini brought to my attention.
So like I stated above, one of the biggest problems I have with the mobile industry is when manufacturers flood the market with devices. But more so when companies launch a device with better specs than their flagship within the same year. Some examples of this are the One X+, 64GB Galaxy S III, and the rumored 32GB Nexus 7. Not only does this anger consumers, but it's a greedy ploy that manufacturers use to capitalize on the success of product by releasing the same product, only better. I can't stand when companies do this. It makes me want to switch manufacturers. But then Motorola took it a step further...
Good ol' Moto launched the Droid Razr M, Droid Razr HD, and Droid Razr Maxx HD. Now I can see the need for the Razr M, it has great specs and a great price point, unlike other devices that I'll address later. But having the Razr HD and then the Razr Maxx HD with a bigger battery and more storage for $100 more? That's just ridiculous. While I don't know the exact prices, I'm sure those components do not cost anywhere near $100. But I'm sure people will buy it. The fact is, most people who walk into a Verizon retailer would rather have a device with a bigger battery that can hold more media. In my opinion, they shouldn't have launched the Razr HD at all. I shouldn't have to shell out extra money for a bigger battery. It just doesn't make sense...
Next I wanted to talk about something that the recently announced Galaxy S III Mini confirmed; Bigger is Better. It has become an increasing trend to make bigger devices with better specs, while devices with smaller screens -usually around 4"- take a back seat in this department. In today's mobile world, it seems that if you want a smaller device you're going to get a slower processor, lower screen resolution, and a lack-luster camera. I don't understand this. Now I think Motorola made a huge mistake with the Razr HD and Maxx HD, but the Razr M is a great device with great specs for the price. But why should people have to sacrifice specs for size? They shouldn't. OEMs need to realize that if people are buying a smaller device, then it means -unless the price plays a part- they want a smaller device.
Now these are just my opinions. I want to know how you guys feel. Do things matter to you?
No comments:
Post a Comment